iPad/iPhone/iPod (iPOS) as Open Platform… Why Bother?
A friend asked me on Twitter this morning:
Why is flash such a contentious issue for Apple? licensing? processing overhead? them wanting to own everything?
Really it all boils down to this: the iPOS is Apple’s end-to-end platform from the processor to the hardware to the operating system, media and communication software, all the way up to the point of sale for music, video, books, and applications to the end users. All of it 100% Apple.
So why bother?
Why bother with partners, contracts, meetings, negotiations, testing, failures, support, and other BS? Why deal with any of that if you don’t have to. Instead, each part of the iPOS is deliberately optimized to work with the others without fail or debate. Apple pwns the chip, the device, the OS… Totally vertical.
Despite isolation, the iPOS platform has been wildly successful. Despite every nasty trick Apple pulls, from the 50% early-adopter tax on the first iPhone to forging Flash content in their promotional material and outright lying about “the entire internet on your device”, they’re kicking ass and we’re eating it up.
We’re buying their toys… along with overpriced specialized connectors and adapters (a tethered wireless-device???)
We’re creating and installing their apps… per approval and 30% cut.
We spread their rumors; We make-up their news.
We create and follow live-blogs and live pirate cell-phone video streams whenever Jobs speaks.
So seriously, from their perspective:
Why no Flash? Why no open platform? Really??? It already works, that’s why.
Why bother?

I’ve got a gig this next weekend. Nothing big, but I do have to play in front of a crowd. As part of that gig I expect to play digital tracks via TRAKTOR. But this afternoon, I was surprised to find I couldn’t actually run TRAKTOR.
I’m writing as a response to Kevin Suttle’s post 

